Alien: Bloodlines

Alien: Bloodlines

In my notes on Aliens: The Original Years I said how much I loved the writing. The way that Mark Verheiden took the story in so many interesting new directions put what happened to the film franchise after James Cameron’s Aliens to shame.

I don’t think what writer Phillip Kennedy Johnson does in this six-issue story arc is on quite the same level as Verheiden’s work, but it’s very good. A tough-as-nails security chief named Gabriel Cruz has to go back to a space station orbiting Earth when his son joins up with an activist group that wants to throw a monkey wrench into what the Weyland-Yutani Corporation is doing up there. Unfortunately, what they’re doing up there is breeding a bunch of Xenomorphs, so of course things get out of hand. It seems that despite all the time spent studying them we’ve never learned how to handle these critters.

Throw in some Bishop-model cyborgs that all look like Lance Henriksen, a super “Alpha” Xenomorph and a mysterious dark queen of the hive, and a strange subplot that has the Xenomorphs forming a psychic bond with Gabriel because he’d survived incubating a facehugger (it was cut out of him before it matured and made its own exit), and I thought there was a lot of interesting stuff going on here, most of which I enjoyed.

What I didn’t like was the art by Salvador Larroca. To give him some credit: the aliens look good and some of the action sequences, like the guy getting his head blown off with a shotgun, are nicely done. But where Larroca really falls down is in his drawing of the human characters, and particularly their faces. Everyone seems made of plastic, or like they’re the product of an AI art-generator, and not a very advanced AI program either. (I also thought the colorist was a program, as the credit is to Guru-eFX, but apparently that’s a real person.) Emotion doesn’t register at all, even when characters are yelling or screaming, and there’s little sense of movement in the way the figures are drawn. From what I’ve been able to gather, there’s a lot of strong opinions on Larocca out there in the comic community and I can only say that while I can see some people liking his style it’s not my thing and it took my grade on this comic down quite a bit.

But if you’re a fan of the franchise I’d definitely recommend this just for the story. You may not like the art any more than I do, but it’s something you’ll be able to put up with.

Graphicalex

Marple: The Four Suspects

I think every mystery story is a magic trick, with the author trying to put one over on us. The challenge is to try and catch their sleight of hand and guess how the trick is being done before the big reveal.

As with a magic act, one of the key tools is misdirection. And, again as with a magic act, the audience knows it’s being misdirected, just not how. So it’s all a dance of deception.

We’re back in a familiar setting here, with the regular gang of friends getting together to solve a mystery put to them by Sir Henry Clithering, ex-Commissioner of Scotland Yard. One thing that’s changed since the Tuesday Night Club started up, however, is that now everyone defers to Miss Marple and her method for coming to a solution. Which she employs again here by decoding some British gardening slang (which is itself a kind of misdirection). But Christie plays fair with the clue we get, even pointing it out, and if I’d put enough thought into it even I might have twigged to what was going on.

The thing is, when our Jane points out the clue you immediately have to wonder if she’s directing us to something important or if we’re being presented with a red herring. But seeing as it’s Miss Marple herself who draws it to our attention, you can probably take it to the bank. Where the misdirection comes in is when the killer attempts to put the police on a false trail. The killers in mystery novels are magicians too, and especially in Christie where they have a real thing for putting on a show, complete with costumes, disguises, and other props.

Marple index

Asterix the Gaul

Asterix the Gaul

This is the first of the Asterix comic books written by René Goscinny and illustrated by Albert Uderzo, and was published in 1961. I grew up reading these in English translations, and I think I had a French edition of one of them too. But this time I wasn’t the English version I remembered, as it was an “all-new more American translation” done in 1999. Back when I read the comics the village druid was named Getafix, but here he’s Panoramix, which is actually his name in the original French even though I don’t like it as much. And I wondered if, when Panoramix says he can make soup in various flavours, including “bacon cheeseburger,” this was a literal translation or something more “American.” Did they have bacon cheeseburgers in France in 1961?

For being the first in the series they hit the ground running with Asterix the Gaul, as the series was basically born full grown with everything in place. Except maybe for Dogmatix. I might have missed Obelix’s little dog but I don’t think he was here. And they even let Cacofonix sing at the final feast, which wasn’t going to happen again very often.

The story has a nice a mix of goofiness (the Romans playing musical chairs to see who will be the secret agent sent to the Gauls’ village), wordplay, and basic moral instruction. When Panoramix explains to Asterix that he doesn’t need the magic potion to beat the Romans but only has to use his native wit, it’s a point that a lot of superhero comics like to make.

The real star though is Uderzo’s art. It’s what impressed me the most when I was a kid and it still does today. And it’s all the more impressive because I can’t think of any comic artist who has created anything quite like it in all the years since. One panel here that really stood out has a Roman troop marching beneath a tree, with Asterix and Obelix perched in silhouette on a branch overhead. There’s so much action and information put into that one drawing, not to mention just how beautiful it is to look at. There aren’t many books you can return to after so many years that hold up so well.

Graphicalex

Bone Parish: Volume Three

Bone Parish: Volume Three

The last volume – or is it just the season one finale? – of the Bone Parish saga. And up to the final issue I was wondering how they were going to manage to wrap everything up in the few pages remaining. Well, much to my surprise Cullen Bunn managed to pull it off. It’s a quick ending, and feels a bit rushed, but it’s satisfactory and does manage to tie up most of the loose ends while holding out the promise of the story continuing. Colour me impressed. I didn’t think it was going to work.

There were no big twists or revelations, while the action seemed bloodier than usual even though the regular gang violence was toned down and the mutants created by the bad batch of Ash weren’t back. I was getting used to Jonas Scharf’s art, and while he has a real weak spot for faces, especially in profiles that he tends to just repeat, he does some good action scenes here, including a couple of nice fights and one great explosion drawing.

So that’s a wrap, with most of the Winters family now deceased and bottled up. But what might be going on in the land of the dead is left a little vague. Is there a voodoo king of the underworld, or is it all just hallucinations? Maybe if the series is continued things like this will be explained, but I’m fine if they just leave it the way they did. Solid work all around.

Graphicalex

Batman: Damned

Batman: Damned

Batman: Damned is a sequel of sorts to the Joker comic put out by the same writer and artist ten years earlier but it was also the first comic to be published under the imprint of DC’s Black Label, which was targeted at mature audiences. The first printing of Damned even included a picture of a nude Bruce Wayne with his dick hanging out, and there are few things as adult as Batman’s dick. So . . . it was something old and something new. But what I really found it to be was overblown and confusing.

The blame, in my opinion, falls on Brian Azzarello. I really didn’t like the writing on any level. Most of it is woefully ungrammatical, no matter who is speaking. The Enchantress I could give a pass too since she’s a demon zombie witch or something so I figure she can say “I be fate written. Die cast. Why you no remember?” But why are Batman’s “diaries” full of stuff like “what don’ kill us eats us alive”? Why are the rapper’s rhymes so weak? Why does the homeless guy say things like “seen him with my own too [sic] eyes”? Why would the mandarin Waynes say things like “Don’t be here when I do get back”? Were these typos? In a prestige publication like this? Or did they have some meaning I was missing? Hell, I even hated the lettering. This was all terrible.

Then there was the plot, which was another take on the idea of the journey of the soul after death. The aim was to do a sort of horror comic, but I was too confused to find any of it very scary or unnerving. So as usual it just turned out dark. There were cameos from figures I didn’t know well (John Constantine, the Spectre) or barely at all (the Enchantress). And there’s an uncomfortable appearance by Harley Quinn, who nearly rapes Batman at one point because . . . she hates him. I didn’t need any of this. But then Swamp Thing shows up and I always like to see Swampy so that was a plus.

It looks fantastic. Lee Bermejo’s art is on point with the noir-horror vibe throughout, making me almost wish DC had done the book as one of those comics without words. I might have followed the story just as well. I’ve really liked some of Azzarello’s stuff, but this struck me as a poorly developed idea that tried to make up for its deficiencies with lots of heavy breathing and broken English. And that’s a shame because I did have the sense it could have been something great.

Graphicalex

Marple: The Companion

Miss Marple got her start in the Tuesday Night Club, and that series was followed up by stories that took a very similar form: dinner guests listen to someone recount a mysterious event that they either witnessed or had heard about, and then the others engage in a competition to see who can solve it. Of course, Miss Marple always wins, not because she’s a great detective (meaning someone who goes out looking for clues, or questioning witnesses), but because she’s good at just sitting back and drawing on her experience of village life, which always provides a key to understanding what’s really going on.

This happens again in “The Companion,” which was another story I enjoyed even if I thought the solution was too easy. I know it was too easy because I had no trouble figuring it out as I was reading, something that rarely happens. And I managed even though one of the clues was the comparison made between two women, one being a bit plump and the other “inclined to scragginess.” Scragginess is not a word I’ve ever used and I’m not even sure if I’ve seen it before, though I did make the connection to scraggly. So all-in-all a nice little mystery story, with a bit of vocabulary-building thrown in.

Marple index

Garbage Man

Garbage Man

There’s a bit at the beginning of Aaron Lopresti’s Garbage Man comic (which is not the sequel to Derf Backderf’s Trashed) where the hero, now an animated pile of toxic sludge complete with bits of rebar sticking out of him, has flashbacks as to how he got that way. As things turn out, he was a corporate lawyer named Richard Morse investigating the goings-on at Titan Chemicals. Titan had been given a government contract to create super-soldiers by injecting test subjects with an HGH (Human Growth Hormone) derivative, combined with a bit of creative gene splicing. The mad doctor in charge at Titan, figuring Morse knew too much, had made him into one of the project’s guinea pigs, and in a lab explosion Morse was propelled into a nearby swamp, from which he then arose as Garbage Man.

When the mad doctor is letting Morse know what he’s going to do to him he says “Stop me if you’ve heard this one before.” Which is Lopresti’s way of letting you know that, yeah, we’ve all heard this one before. Basically Garbage Man is a cross between Swamp Thing and the Toxic Avenger, with Hellboy’s granite hand thrown in for good measure. He actually looks a lot like Swamp Thing too, so much so that when another experiment gone bad appears that looks even more like Swampy it seems redundant (this latter figure is called Mossy Man).

I liked the art and colours here, but the story really is pretty basic stuff, and the not-so-basic stuff (like the guy who dreams dinosaurs into life) is a mess. Garbage Man slowly remembers, in fits and starts, what happened to him and so he goes after the people responsible. Along the way he’s helped by a preacher who lives among the homeless in the city’s sewers, and an old flame who, remarkably, isn’t too freaked out by his appearance. There’s also a trio of superhero types called the Night Club that play an ambiguous role. Maybe if the series continues we’ll find out more about them. But as far as I know this is all the Garbage Man we’ve got.

The individual comics/chapters are only ten pages long so things move really quickly. And it’s fun. But at the same time it didn’t really strike me as anything special and the story itself is very worn. Good as a diversion then, but not a comic I’m likely to remember very long or want to bother re-reading anytime soon.

Graphicalex

Man-Bat

Man-Bat

A straightforward, self-contained five-issue story arc by Dave Wielgosz that has Batman sort of fighting and sort of teaming up with Man-Bat (Dr. Kirk Langstrom) to take on Scarecrow.

I don’t really know much about Man-Bat but he struck me as a very similar character to Marvel’s Lizard: another doctor with a monstrous alter ego he keeps trying to find a cure for. But then I guess you could take the same model further back to Dr. Bruce Banner and the Hulk, and before that to Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. There’s some truth, maybe a lot of truth, to the idea that there are only a handful of stories and characters that we keep recycling. This one expresses the notion that we all have a dark side or primal id that we try to control but that keeps erupting in violent and dangerous ways.

The Freudian model or myth (which can be taken as another version of the same story) is useful here because Langstrom/Man-Bat is literally put on the couch by Harley Quinn (a trained psychologist, she reminds us), and subliminally conditioned by Scarecrow (Dr. Jonathan Crane being another doctor of psychology). Is Langstrom barking up the wrong tree in trying to find a cure for his Man-Bat condition in a lab? Maybe all he needs is therapy. Then again, therapy doesn’t seem to have rid Batman of any of his demons, which are released here by a sonic gun Scarecrow invented that unleashes the basest instincts of all the citizens of Gotham.

It’s not a ground-breaking comic in any way, but I found it quick and entertaining. Sumit Kumar’s art has a bit of a manga flavour to it, and the covers by Kyle Hotz and Alejandro Sánchez are great. I even had to laugh at the cover for issue #1, which clearly has the silhouette of the Bat Signal looking like Man-Bat’s balls hanging down from his crotch. I don’t think that was an accident. They knew what they were doing!

Graphicalex

Marple: The Blue Geranium

Finally a good Miss Marple story. The setting is familiar, with Miss Marple invited to a dinner at the Bantry estate, where she listens to a ghost story about the wife of a friend of Colonel Bantry being frightened to death by a strange prophecy. Or at least so it seems. But Miss Marple isn’t having any of it: “You see, if I were going to kill anyone – which, of course, I wouldn’t dream of doing for a minute, because it would be very wicked . . . I shouldn’t be at all satisfied to trust to fright.” Instead there’s a complicated plot involving the usual ruses (chemicals, poison, disguise). But the solution comes by way of a single clue that is nicely slipped in and that plays fair. What I mean is that you don’t have to know about hundreds and thousands or Somerset House, but just pay attention to something that gets said in passing that is revealed to be significant later when something else is said, again in passing. It’s the sort of thing you can smile at and say “OK, I missed that, but it was very clever.” I think that’s the most you can say for a short mystery story, so well done!

Marple index

Not that kind of book

One of the more controversial bits of information coming out along with the revelations, first made in the Toronto Star this past week, that author Alice Munro knew about her husband’s sexual interference with her daughter and chose to say and do nothing about it, is that, as the Star reported, this is something “everybody knew.”

By “everybody” what I think is meant is anyone with any interest in the matter. Including, as further reporting has turned up, Munro’s biographer, her publisher, and other parts of the Canadian media. Robert Thacker, an academic who wrote a biography of Munro, was interviewed by the Washington Post and had this to say in his defence:

“Clearly she [Munro’s daughter, who had told him of the matter] hoped — or she hoped at that time, anyway — that I would make it public,” he told The Post on Monday. “I wasn’t prepared to do that. And the reason I wasn’t prepared to do that is that, it wasn’t that kind of book. I wasn’t writing a tell-all biography. And I’ve lived long enough to know that stuff happens in families that they don’t want to talk about and that they want to keep in families.”

Leaving aside the odd idea that when a family member approached Thacker wanting to make a story public, he saw this as an example of something that families didn’t want to talk about and make public, I want to focus on his claim that he was not writing “that kind of book.”

Hm. What “kind of book” would that be? Here’s the publisher’s description of Thacker’s Alice Munro: Writing Her Lives: A Biography:

This is the book about one of the world’s great authors, Alice Munro, which shows how her life and her stories intertwine.

For almost thirty years Robert Thacker has been researching this book, steeping himself in Alice Munro’s life and work, working with her co-operation to make it complete. The result is a feast of information for Alice Munro’s admirers everywhere.

By following “the parallel tracks” of Alice Munro’s life and Alice Munro’s texts, he gives a thorough and revealing account of both her life and work.

Let’s flag this bit: “working with her co-operation to make it complete.” How much confidence does that inspire that you’re going to read a complete, or thorough and revealing, bio?

But to return to “not that kind of book.” Where had I heard that before? Might it have been when Peter Biskind was attacked for not mentioning anything about Harvey Weinstein’s predatory habits (a pattern of conduct that “everybody knew” about) when Biskind had been writing a book on Weinstein? As I wrote previously: while admitting he knew about these rumours Biskind never raised them with Weinstein, saying “I never asked him about it because . . . I didn’t feel it was relevant to what I was doing.” Not that kind of book, you see.

Well, I’ve said it before. And then again. And then again and again. Munro’s name even came up in one of those earlier posts, and her attempts to “control the narrative” by cutting off another academic who was writing about her. This was not a mistake Thacker was going to make. From the Post story: “Thacker said that he and Munro spoke about the matter in 2008, when they met in a restaurant for an interview. Munro asked him to turn off his recorder.” Which I assume he did. “Working with her co-operation . . .” If you want to see an author raked over the coals, try dipping your toe in the comment thread following the Post story online.

So just to repeat the key takeaway: access always comes with strings attached, which turns the job of biographer into that of publicist. As the old saying goes, if you’re not reading something that somebody doesn’t want you to read, you’re reading an ad.