Marple: A Deadly Wedding Day

Miss Marple was already a dinosaur when Agatha Christie introduced the character in 1927’s “The Tuesday Night Club.” Her age seemed to be fluid as times changed (the last book featuring her was published in the 1970s) but she always remained an old lady, meaning somewhere north of 70. In 4:50 from Paddington it’s said that her 90th birthday is coming up, but usually Christie avoided being that specific.

Biological age isn’t what I’m talking about though. Just as she remained a perennially old lady, Jane was also an eternal Victorian, wary of any fashion or behaviour that might be labeled “modern.” And it’s that old-fashioned character that Dreda Say Mitchell leans into in “A Deadly Wedding Day,” a story set sometime in the 1960s. Miss Marple has been invited to a wedding and she’s immediately put out (as much as she can be put out, which is to say mildly) by guests who resemble actors “from one of those modern New Wave films that critics seemed to enjoy so much but which left their audiences thoroughly confused.” One guest in particular makes a special impression: a willowy woman “sporting a blond Vidal Sassoon bobbed haircut and a tan.” I don’t know which of these, the haircut or the tan, Miss M is more shocked by. Anyway, the same woman wears “what was known in the more salacious newspapers as a ‘mini-skirt.’ It was immodestly short and certainly not the kind of attire you would expect a respectable young lady to wear to a wedding reception.”

Don’t worry if you think this is a giveaway that the willowy blonde is being introduced as too obvious a suspect though, as she’s dead pretty quickly. That leaves Miss M and an old friend she first met during the Blitz to figure out who poisoned the victim’s fruit salad. This is done pretty handily, and enjoyably, albeit not in a way that’s very easy to play along with. The main wrinkle is that Miss Marple is aware of social conventions and can actually buck them in ways that turn out to be helpful. For example, she gets some information out of the groom by suggesting that the bride make a speech at the reception, which has one old lawyer in attendance think that she’s “a radical or something.” But seeing as these are the 1960s and “the world was swinging, and changing fast,” her suggestion carries the day. More to the point in this case though is that Miss Marple has enlightened views on race relations, since the bride is a black woman. “While one might hope,” she muses, “that, in the England of the 1960s, racial prejudice would be a thing of the past, sadly that was not the case.” Despite being a dinosaur, Miss M is actually ahead of her times here, as England in the 1960s, like most places in the world at the time, had definitely not moved past racial prejudice. By coincidence, the story that appears before this one in the anthology Marple: Twelve New Stories, “The Jade Empress,” emphasizes the same progressive racial perspective. Now sure that’s more our perspective than that of a Victorian lady or a conservative woman in 1960s England, but I think it’s a dramatically productive way of playing with the character.

Marple index

8 thoughts on “Marple: A Deadly Wedding Day”

  1. Dramatically productive or whitewashing history? Since I see it the other way, these stories would not appeal to me, I’m afraid. I’m assuming you’d agree at least insofar as Christie’s own text being re-written to erase “problematic” phrasing……?

    Like

    • Yeah, you probably wouldn’t like it much. I don’t approve of the rewriting of texts to fit modern audiences. I think they’ve done that with Christie and with Fleming’s Bond novels. But I guess bowdlerization is nothing new, given how old the word is.

      Like

      • This is the second time you’ve referenced Bond in this context. I pooh-poohed it in my own mind the first time. This time I had to look it up. And damn if you aren’t right. Fleming’s idiot estate authorized edits in 2023 and those are still current, albeit with a disclaimer at the beginning of each book.

        But it didn’t stop there. Way before all that, when the books were originally published, we had his American paperback publishers making undisclosed changes to both censor certain things and Americanize others. Fortunately I first discovered the books in the library in the 70s and because those were all hardcovers featuring the original text I got lucky. (Then there was another sweet spot from 2012 to 2022 when Penguin got the rights.)

        So now I see I’ve got a mix of edited and unedited books in my own personal library and never realized it. Going to have to be careful which ones I pick up going forward!

        It shouldn’t be this hard to preserve history.

        Like

      • Haha! Not all of my comments can be pooh-poohed! Many yes, but not all!

        I can’t remember the other authors who were getting the same treatment now, but there were a few famous ones. There was some buzz about it a while back.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply