Clever idea, but I didn’t think Andrew Grant pulled it off.
Here’s the clever part: a retelling of The Hound of the Baskervilles in the form of text messages. Note that the story itself isn’t updated to modern times. We’re still out on the moors at the end of the nineteenth century. But I guess everyone has some kind of Internet connection and iPhones. So the events are presented as a series of brief posts with follow-ups and likes/dislikes from other characters.
So, clever idea. You’ll have to know the novel pretty well because if you go into this cold you’ll get confused trying to follow the plot. But given the target audience I think familiarity with The Hound can be taken for granted. Where Grant lost me is, first of all, in how public the posts were supposed to be. People like and dislike things that they shouldn’t know about, at least if the plot is to make any sense. Then, as a second point, things get a bit woolly when the Hound and Sir Charles Baskerville’s ghost “like” different posts. I realize this is all tongue-in-cheek and having a bit of fun, but there’s a failure of internal logic that I found myself digging my heels in against. I
So it had potential, and I wouldn’t be surprised if other writers have had a go at something similar (I seem to remember seeing Shakespeare done as text messages), but it didn’t work for me in this instance.
Ghosts texting and liking stuff? And the Hound? Yeah, that’s going a step too far…
LikeLike
Yeah I didn’t like that part. It got too silly.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Now, if it had been silly, like a Warlock Holmes, from the get-go I could see it. But other wise, no.
LikeLike
Some day I’ll give WH a try. Awfully big TBR pile yet though.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Given your penchant for Holmes fanfic and stuff, I’m sure you’ll eventually get around to it.
LikeLike
Well at least he tried.
I suppose.
LikeLike
He did try something interesting and tried to spin it in a fun way, I’ll give him that.
LikeLike