I think I knew that Stephen King had written a Sherlock Holmes story, but finding “The Doctor’s Case” was still a bit of a surprise. Detective fiction wasn’t really his thing. Luckily this came out in 1987, a time when King was writing at the height of his considerable powers. I’ve written before about the Rule of Ten when it comes to authors, and for King you could place his big decade roughly in the 1980s. 1987 was the same year as Misery, one of his best books. So Holmes was in good hands here.
The doctor whose case this is, you’ll be interested to know, is Dr. Watson himself. The hook here is that it is Watson who actually solves the case, or mostly solves it. And this is no small matter of just providing Holmes with a helpful nudge, perhaps unconsciously. No, this is a prize “locked room” mystery that Lestrade has specially invited Holmes in to investigate and it is Watson who figures out how the murder was committed. Admittedly the house where the crime took place is full of cats and Holmes has an allergy to felines so he is congested and breaking out in a rash, meaning he’s not operating in peak condition, but still it’s impressive how Watson scoops him. And Holmes does give him credit, while belittling him a bit at the end for not extending his observations so far as to grasp the full story of what happened.
This is a solid pastiche that never winks at the reader with parodic intent but deals out various canonical elements while presenting a neat puzzle that’s basically a sort of magic trick. Then there’s a denouement that involves a shuffle of moral justice that Doyle often indulged. In short, King knew the assignment and delivered. Whatever else you want to say about him, the man has always been a total pro.
Alex Good 
That’s interesting, didn’t know he’d done that, but not surprised he nailed it.
LikeLike
It’s a good read. And while the mystery itself is a bit of a stretch, it’s less so than many of Doyle’s stories.
LikeLiked by 1 person
No, didn’t know this. What collection is it in? I’d dispute “always been a total professional” based on Insomnia alone, which, if I recall, was a “contract” book, a piece of crap, and a finger in the eye to his readers. But the man can write, and this interests me.
(Wasn’t it Insomnia that had the little bubbles over people’s heads?)
LikeLike
It was originally published in The New Adventures of Sherlock Holmes (1987), then reprinted in Nightmares & Dreamscapes (1993). I was reading it in an Otto Penzler Sherlock Holmes anthology.
I haven’t read Insomnia. Or much of King’s latest stuff. He may be losing his juice a bit, being almost 80 and having written so much. I think his peak was in the ’80s. Of course, being a professional can cut both ways. It might cover a lot of hack work.
LikeLike
Insomnia was 94.
But this is good — I’ve got Nightmares & Dreamscapes. : -)
LikeLike
That long ago? That surprises me. Time flies.
LikeLiked by 1 person
King was good when he was out of his gourd on drugs. Cue the 80s music…
LikeLike
Whatever it takes. That’s part of being a pro.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Mr Miyagi was a pro, but I didn’t see him pushing drugs down Daniel-san’s throat.
LikeLike
It would give a whole different spin on that training montage in karate kid though 🙂
LikeLike
How well did we really know Mr. Miyagi though? He may have been a drug kingpin.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It would explain the animosity experienced in Karate Kid II.
The islanders thought he was moving back in on their territory.
LikeLike
I only ever saw the first movie. I think they made several. Like an original trilogy and then a couple of reboots.
And I never saw any Kung-Fu Panda movies.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There were 3 with Daniel-san, then a 4th with some new girl, which flopped. Then the reboots, which I never watched as it starred Jackiecommie Chan.
I saw the first kung-fu panda movie. I’m much more entertained by cartoons than you though, so that’s no surprise 🙂
LikeLike