The King in Yellow
The King in Yellow is a book by Robert W. Chambers first published in 1895 that is nearly as mysterious as the sinister work it takes its name from. It’s a collection of short stories, the first four of which are linked and have some connection to a fictional play, The King in Yellow, which has the effect of driving anyone who reads it crazy. In this graphic adaptation by I. N. J. Culbard it’s these first four stories – “The Repairer of Reputations,” “The Mask,” “The Yellow Sign,” and “In the Court of the Dragon” – that are represented.
I say it’s a mysterious book because despite being in the public domain and freely available on the Internet I don’t think it’s that widely read except by people interested in its influence on H. P. Lovecraft. But even Lovecraft had reservations about how good it was. As a side note of some interest, on the copyright page to this book we’re told that it’s an “Original story by H. P. Lovecraft / Adapted and Illustrated by I. N. J. Culbard.” That gives you some idea of how much cultural cachet Chambers has lost to his successor.
I don’t think much of Chambers’s book. To be honest, I never made it all the way through. So I was happy to come across this comic crib, which struck me as playing fair with the source material while having a vision of its own that nicely complements Chambers while making a fair job of stitching together the different stories. I liked the presentation of the pale, ghoulish figures who represent the King’s servants in our dimension, and could get behind the decision to switch from a first-person narrative. It’s a good comic, but at the end of it all I didn’t feel I had any greater understanding of what was going on and I still can’t say I think the original is a work of the first rank.
Did it drive you crazy, like it did for the Fine Young Cannibals?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Huh. Wasn’t expecting a FYC reference here, but I guess it works.
LikeLiked by 2 people
So DOES reading it drive you crazy? How would you know? Watching 3 Body Problem didn’t do much for my mental health….
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can’t answer this, since I said goodbye to robust mental health some time ago. I’m not sure what going crazy would look like anymore.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I have honk the definition of insanity is watching four decades of Ghostbusters movies and hoping for the same result you got in 1984.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Or hoping that Hollywood might come up with anything new.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I honk so.
LikeLike
I thought the King in Yellow was part of the Cthulhu thing but obviously not.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Nah, predates it. Yellow King is pretty vague. Cthulhu is all about tentacles and such.
LikeLiked by 3 people
So, let me mansplain some stuff to you and Alex….
~cracks knuckles
The King in Yellow was it own little thing that was written and then never enlarged upon by its author, Chambers. It languished until Lovecraft read it, and he stole it and made the King in Yellow one of the elder gods in his Cthulhu Mythos and called him by a different name (possibly Hastur?). That still wasn’t enough because Lovecraft was a failure in his own time.
Fast forward some years.
Suddenly, dead Lovecraft and his stories are popular. Everyone loves that cosmic horror stuff. Scads of stuff is written, people investigate and they find that this Hastur thingy is based on something called the King in Yellow. Some brave people set out to write the King in Yellow in its own universe, like it was originally intended. They valiantly try and partially succeed, but the connection to Lovecraft and Cthulhu is too strong and the KiY remains attached to the Cthuhlu Mythos as an appendage instead of its own thing.
I hope that helps 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
It helps immensley thanks Booky.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Excellent. I might hate on people like S.T. Joshi for diving into the Cthulhu Mythos, but in many ways, I am cut from the same cloth in regards to other Mythos. Like the KiY 😉
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hey, everything I said to Fraggle was right!
LikeLiked by 1 person
But you forgot to “mansplain” it. That’s unforgivable…
LikeLike
I tend to agree that the original KiY isn’t as good as some of the follow up stuff. But the ideas presented give a huge world to play in and that is why I went down the KiY road fully and only partially down the Cthulhu road.
Was this a paper copy?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree that there’s a strong idea here. Or maybe not even that but a promising start of an idea. But that’s about it. I’m glad people ran with it, but I haven’t really dipped into any of the subsequent stuff
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s ok. Not everyone can be as obsessive as me 😉
LikeLike
Yes, paper copy. I don’t read many books in digital formats, and no graphic novels or comics.
LikeLiked by 1 person