I’ve been reading most of these Maigret books in order, but I jumped way ahead by mistake and read this one immediately after finishing Maigret’s Holiday. This led to a bit of whiplash, as Maigret’s Holiday had been published in 1947 and Maigret and the Killer came out in 1969. I’d been jerked, along with the technophobic Maigret, from the France of peasants and horse-drawn carts (or at least la France profonde) into the swinging world of Paris chic and the murder of a young man with disturbingly long hair who might be David Hemmings from Blow-Up (1966), only armed with a tape recorder instead of a camera.
“A political matter?” the reporters ask. “A love affair?” No, just madness. In other words, a modern, ironic crime, without any explanatory narrative: one where evidence means nothing and Maigret does less work than usual in waiting for the solution to come to him in the form of a guilt-bound, pathetic Raskolnikov. A crime more of our own time then, for not signifying much of anything. Welcome to random days.
I’m beginning to wonder how an earth he made books of something out of not much at all by the sounds of it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Mysteries have a really basic formula that doesn’t allow for much variation. Somebody gets killed, the detective goes to work interviewing different suspects. There are some clues. The killer is revealed. Given how many of them he wrote, I think Simenon actually mixes things up pretty good.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So, no insight into Jerry Lee Lewis, then?
LikeLike
Jerry Lewis. He was big in France.
LikeLike